Skip to main content

New California Law Protecting Employees Using Marijuana Off-Duty



In recent years, the legalization of marijuana for recreational use in California has led to significant legal developments regarding the rights of employees who use the substance. The enactment of Assembly Bill 2188 (AB 2188) and Senate Bill (SB) No. 700 has brought about essential changes in the state's Fair Employment and Housing Act, impacting employers and employees in relation to marijuana use and drug testing.

Off-Duty Marijuana Usage Protection

AB 2188, which took effect on January 1, 2024, amended California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act to protect employees’ off-duty, off-site cannabis use. It prohibits employers from discriminating against employees for off-duty use, with certain exceptions. This amendment offers crucial protections to employees who engage in off-duty marijuana use, safeguarding them from adverse employment actions solely based on their cannabis consumption outside of work hours.

Exceptions to Off-Duty Marijuana Usage Protection:

- The protection does not apply to those working in the building or construction trades, as they often operate in high-risk environments requiring comprehensive safety precautions.

- It also does not extend to employees hired for positions that necessitate federal background investigations or security clearances.

- Additionally, the protection does not override state or federal laws that mandate testing job applicants or employees for controlled substances.

Drug Testing and Nonpsychoactive Cannabis Metabolites

Furthermore, AB 2188 prohibits discrimination against employees based on drug test results that reveal only nonpsychoactive cannabis metabolites in their system, as opposed to psychoactive cannabis metabolites. This means that if an employee tests positive for marijuana during a drug screen but the testing reveals no traces of psychoactive metabolites, the employer cannot use the positive test as the basis for disciplinary action or termination.

Traditional drug tests have been known to screen for nonpsychoactive cannabis metabolites, which can remain in the body for an extended period after cannabis use. The new law emphasizes that drug testing is intended to analyze impairment at work, and testing for nonpsychoactive metabolites that have no effect on impairment falls outside the purpose of drug testing.

Implications and Exemptions

It's important to note that the new law does not prohibit employers from conducting drug tests, but it does provide critical protections for employees in scenarios where traditional drug tests may not accurately reflect impairment at work. Moreover, the law stipulates that employees cannot be impaired by or use cannabis on the job, even for medicinal purposes. Employers found to have discriminated against an employee in violation of AB 2188 may face legal action and be subject to various forms of relief, including reinstatement, back pay, compensatory and punitive damages, as well as interest, fees, and costs.

Conclusion

The new California law stands as a significant step in protecting employees from discrimination based on off-duty cannabis use and nonpsychoactive cannabis metabolites detected in drug tests. It is essential for both employers and employees in California to understand the implications of this law and ensure compliance with its provisions. Employers are encouraged to review and revise their antidiscrimination policies and drug use policies to align with the new protections concerning prior cannabis use as outlined in SB 700.

In conclusion, the enactment of AB 2188 and SB No. 700 marks a significant shift in the legal landscape surrounding marijuana use and employment in California, aiming to strike a balance between protecting employees' rights and ensuring workplace safety and productivity.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Understanding Protected Activity Under California Labor Laws

In California, labor laws protect employees from discrimination and retaliation for engaging in certain activities, known as protected activities. Understanding these protected activities is crucial for both employers and employees to ensure compliance with the law and maintain a fair and respectful work environment. Protected Categories California labor laws prohibit discrimination based on several protected categories, including: Race and Ethnicity : It is illegal to discriminate against employees based on their race, color, or national origin. Gender and Sexual Orientation : Discrimination based on gender, gender identity, gender expression, or sexual orientation is prohibited. Age : California law protects individuals who are 40 years of age or older from age-based discrimination. Disability : Employers are required to provide reasonable accommodations to employees with disabilities and are prohibited from discriminating against them. Religion : Discrimination based on an individua

Reporting to Work and Being Sent Home: Understanding Reporting Time Pay under California Labor Laws

  Reporting to work as scheduled, only to be sent home shortly after arriving, can be a frustrating experience for employees. However, under California labor laws, employees may be entitled to reporting time pay in certain situations. In this blog, we will delve into the concept of reporting time pay, its applicability, and the relevant regulations under California law. What is Reporting Time Pay? Reporting time pay refers to the compensation provided to non-exempt employees when they report to work as scheduled but are not provided with the expected amount of work. This compensation is intended to compensate employees for the inconvenience and financial loss associated with reporting to work but not being able to work the expected hours. Applicability of Reporting Time Pay In California, reporting time pay is governed by the Industrial Welfare Commission Orders, particularly Orders 4 and 7, which outline the regulations related to reporting time pay. These regulations apply to non-ex

On-Call Time Pay under California Wage and Hour Laws

  On-call time is a common aspect of many professions, requiring employees to be available to work if needed, even when they are not actively working. In California, the regulations regarding on-call time pay are designed to ensure that employees are fairly compensated for their time and availability. In this blog, we will explore the concept of on-call time pay, its applicability, and the relevant regulations under California wage and hour laws. What is On-Call Time Pay? On-call time pay refers to the compensation provided to employees for the time they are required to be on-call and available to work, even if they are not actively working during that time. This compensation is intended to recognize the inconvenience and restrictions that on-call duties can place on employees’ personal time and activities. Applicability of On-Call Time Pay In California, on-call time pay is governed by the Industrial Welfare Commission Orders, particularly Orders 4 and 7, which outline the regulation

The Importance of Checking Your Paystub for Unlawful Deductions under California Labor Laws

In California, stringent california payroll laws are designed to shield workers from unjust treatment in the workplace. A key component of these regulations is the mandate for employers to furnish precise paystubs, aligning with california paycheck laws, to their workforce. This measure is vital as it empowers employees to verify the accuracy of their compensation and to confirm that their earnings are free from any illegal wage deductions. Understanding California Labor Laws Under the umbrella of California law, employers must supply a comprehensive, written wage statement to their employees, detailing all wage deductions as part of their payroll records. These paystubs should include data such as gross wages, total hours worked, itemized deductions from wages, net wages, the specific dates of the pay period, alongside the employee's name and the last four digits of their social security number. Importance of Checking Your Paystub Regularly examining your paystub is imperative to

California Wage Laws for Hourly Employees with Bonuses

In California, hourly employees who receive bonuses should pay close attention to the calculation of their regular rate of pay. This is crucial because California wage laws require that the regular rate of pay is recalculated when factoring in bonuses. Failing to do so could result in underpayment and potential legal issues. In this blog, we will discuss the importance of ensuring that hourly employees with bonuses have their regular rate of pay recalculated in accordance with California wage laws. Importance of Recalculating Regular Rate of Pay Legal Compliance : California labor laws mandate that non-discretionary bonuses, such as production or performance bonuses, must be included in the calculation of the regular rate of pay for overtime purposes. Failure to do so could lead to violations of state labor laws. Overtime Pay Accuracy : Recalculating the regular rate of pay ensures that hourly employees receive the correct amount of overtime pay. By including non-discretionary bonuses